What Works? Program Evaluation Techniques for Policy Managers
Coursalytics is an independent platform to find, compare, and book executive courses. Coursalytics is not endorsed by, sponsored by, or otherwise affiliated with McCourt School of Public Policy .Full disclaimer.
The policy process is increasingly data-driven, but it is often challenging to make sense of competing estimates of programs’ impacts. This two-day course will help you to understand where these estimates come from and which ones are the most credible. You will develop a more sophisticated understanding of the critical distinction between causation and correlation, you will learn about techniques that can provide plausible estimates of policies’ true impacts, and you will learn why these techniques often work…and why they sometimes don’t.
You need no prior exposure to these concepts to take the course. We will be following a “ground-up” approach, under the assumption that you are learning the material for the first time.
By the end of the class, you will be able to:
- Distinguish between correlational and causal evidence of programs’ impacts;
- Understand how to evaluate evidence produced by a range of analytical techniques, including randomized trials, simulation modeling,instrumental variables analysis, statistical matching, difference-in-differences, and regression discontinuity; and
- Be able to explain in clear, jargon-free language how these techniques work and when they are (or are not) likely to prove useful as guides for policy formulation.
Who should attend
This course is for:
- Managers who supervise staff engaged in program evaluation activities;
- Professionals who advise policymakers and wish to develop a stronger evidence base for their recommendations; and
- Analysts at research organizations, government agencies, and nonprofits who seek to develop a more rigorous understanding of program evaluation techniques.